Non-Biblical Doctrines: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 05:43, 23 July 2014

This article contains links to articles on various doctrines taught by William Branham that he said were Biblical. But they are not. These are all examples of "Twisted Theology", where William Branham takes scripture and completely bends its intended meaning. Click on the picture or description name for the full article.

Click on headings to expand them, or links to go to specific articles.

Major Doctrines

What does it mean to have Fallen From Grace? Is it how you dress? Or is it something radical like replacing faith in Jesus Christ with a man-made law?

Enoch and Noah were on the Earth preaching at the same time, according to William Branham. Enoch represented the wise virgin while Noah represented the foolish virgin. Is this what the Bible actually teaches?

Matthew 24:28 says "For wheresoever the carcass is, there will the eagles be gathered together" in the King James Version. The English Standard Version says "Wherever the corpse is, there the vultures will gather." How does this simple change impact Message doctrine?

Michael the Archangel. To most Christians he is an angel. To Jehovah Witnesses he is Jesus. William Branham also taught that Michael was Jesus in the form of an Angel. Is this Biblical?

Are There Women Angels? Did you know that the Book of Zechariah talks about winged women?

Was King Saul the people’s choice by democratic vote? Or was he the king that God chose? What does the Bible say, and what did William Branham say?

Were the midwives of Egypt good or bad? William Branham called them witches. The Bible calls them God fearing. Why the difference?

Do lilies toil? William Branham said they do, Jesus said they don't. Why was William Branham misquoting Jesus?

Why did John weep in the book of Revelation? John wrote that it was because "no man was found worthy to open and to read the book." William Branham said, "It wasn't that. A man under the influence of the Holy Ghost wouldn't weep for that...I believe he was weeping for joy!" Why did he obviously change scripture to match the doctrine he wanted to preach?

Abraham and Sarah. When The Lord told Abraham they would have a child, and Sarah laughed in the tent, then denied it to the angel, WMB said if it wasn't for Abraham, God would have struck her dead. But is this what the Bible teaches?

Amos 3:3. William Branham's interpretation of Amos 3:3 emphasized that God did not want people to be in unity when they had a basic disagreement about some important matter. For example, he said that God could never be among the United Nations because people in different nations were too different from one another in their views. Is this really what the Bible says?

The Sin in the Wilderness. William Branham believed that the children of Israel that died in the wilderness and did not enter the promised land were eternally lost. But is this what the Bible teaches?

=Navigation=

Home Our Podcast The List of Problems Life Story Prophecies & Visions Seven Seals Was William Branham Honest? Doctrines	Church Ages Jesus Languages Videos Print Resources Help! Facebook Contact Us

@@ Line 94: / Line 94: @@
 {|style="width:800px; vertical-align:top; text-align:left;"
 |-
-|'''[[The Midwives of Egypt|Were the midwives of Egypt good or bad?]]''' William Branham called them evil witches.  The Bible calls them God fearing.  Why the difference?
+|'''[[The Midwives of Egypt|Were the midwives of Egypt good or bad?]]''' William Branham called them witches.  The Bible calls them God fearing.  Why the difference?
 |-
 |}
+{|style="width:800px; vertical-align:top; text-align:left;"
+|-
+|<div style="border-bottom:1px #B87333 solid; text-align:center; font-size:140%; padding:1px; margin:1px;"></div>
+|-
+|}
+{|style="width:800px; vertical-align:top; text-align:left;"
+|-
+|'''[[Lilies Do Not Toil|Do lilies toil?]]''' William Branham said they do, Jesus said they don't. Why was William Branham misquoting Jesus?
+|-
+|}
+{|style="width:800px; vertical-align:top; text-align:left;"
+|-
+|<div style="border-bottom:1px #B87333 solid; text-align:center; font-size:140%; padding:1px; margin:1px;"></div>
+|-
+|}
+{|style="width:800px; vertical-align:top; text-align:left;"
+|-
+|'''[[The Reason John Wept|Why did John weep in the book of Revelation?]]''' John wrote that it was because "no man was found worthy to open and to read the book."  William Branham said, "It wasn't that. A man under the influence of the Holy Ghost wouldn't weep for that...I believe he was weeping for joy!"  Why did he obviously change scripture to match the doctrine he wanted to preach?
+|-
+|}
+{|style="width:800px; vertical-align:top; text-align:left;"
+|-
+|<div style="border-bottom:1px #B87333 solid; text-align:center; font-size:140%; padding:1px; margin:1px;"></div>
+|-
+|}
+{|style="width:800px; vertical-align:top; text-align:left;"
+|-
+|'''[[Abraham and Sarah]]'''. When The Lord told Abraham they would have a child, and Sarah laughed in the tent, then denied it to the angel, WMB said if it wasn't for Abraham, God would have struck her dead. But is this what the Bible teaches?
+|-
+|}
+{|style="width:800px; vertical-align:top; text-align:left;"
+|-
+|<div style="border-bottom:1px #B87333 solid; text-align:center; font-size:140%; padding:1px; margin:1px;"></div>
+|-
+|}
+{|style="width:800px; vertical-align:top; text-align:left;"
+|-
+|'''[[Amos 3:3]]'''. William Branham's interpretation of Amos 3:3 emphasized that God did not want people to be in unity when they had a basic disagreement about some important matter. For example, he said that God could never be among the United Nations because people in different nations were too different from one another in their views. Is this really what the Bible says?
+|-
+|}
+{|style="width:800px; vertical-align:top; text-align:left;"
+|-
+|<div style="border-bottom:1px #B87333 solid; text-align:center; font-size:140%; padding:1px; margin:1px;"></div>
+|-
+|}
+{|style="width:800px; vertical-align:top; text-align:left;"
+|-
+|'''[[The Sin in the Wilderness]]'''. William Branham believed that the children of Israel that died in the wilderness and did not enter the promised land were eternally lost. But is this what the Bible teaches?
+|-
+|}