Q&A on the Godhead: Difference between revisions
Line 134: | Line 134: | ||
William Branham taught that there was a difference between "everlasting" and "eternal": | William Branham taught that there was a difference between "everlasting" and "eternal": | ||
:But then read the other, "But these shall go into eternal (That's a different. See?), Eternal Life. Eternal comes from the word of eternity, and eternity had neither beginning nor end. It's forever and forever. Now, that should answer that (See?), because if you'll just read the Scripture real close, you'll see. "And these shall go away into everlasting punishment, but the righteous..." The wicked shall go into everlasting punishment, be punished for a space of time: maybe a billion years, I don't know; but you'll certainly be punished for your sins.<ref>QUESTIONS.AND.ANSWERS.ON.HEBREWS.1_ JEFF.IN COD WEDNESDAY_ 57-0925</ref> | :But then read the other, "But these shall go into eternal (That's a different. See?), Eternal Life. Eternal comes from the word of eternity, and eternity had neither beginning nor end. It's forever and forever. Now, that should answer that (See?), because if you'll just read the Scripture real close, you'll see. "And these shall go away into everlasting punishment, but the righteous..." The wicked shall go into everlasting punishment, be punished for a space of time: maybe a billion years, I don't know; but you'll certainly be punished for your sins.''<ref>QUESTIONS.AND.ANSWERS.ON.HEBREWS.1_ JEFF.IN COD WEDNESDAY_ 57-0925</ref> | ||
:''Now, hell, we'll go back to that awhile. I tell you that--that there cannot be... I do believe in a burning hell. Yes, sir, the Bible said so, the lake of fire. Now, but that cannot be an everla--it cannot be an eternal. It could be... The Bible never says it's eternal; it says everlasting hell. Don't say the word "eternal"; it says an everlasting hell. Now, it's prepared for the devil and his angels; an everlasting hell, not an eternal one. | :''Now, hell, we'll go back to that awhile. I tell you that--that there cannot be... I do believe in a burning hell. Yes, sir, the Bible said so, the lake of fire. Now, but that cannot be an everla--it cannot be an eternal. It could be... The Bible never says it's eternal; it says everlasting hell. Don't say the word "eternal"; it says an everlasting hell. Now, it's prepared for the devil and his angels; an everlasting hell, not an eternal one. | ||
:''Now, after... That soul may be tormented there for its doing for ten million years, for all I know. I don't know what everlasting might be in God's sight. It might be for five minutes; it might be for a million years; it might be for ten million years; but there will come a time when that soul will cease to be.<ref>THE.SMYRNAEAN.CHURCH.AGE_ JEFF.IN ROJC 185-227 TUESDAY_ 60-1206</ref> | :''Now, after... That soul may be tormented there for its doing for ten million years, for all I know. I don't know what everlasting might be in God's sight. It might be for five minutes; it might be for a million years; it might be for ten million years; but there will come a time when that soul will cease to be.''<ref>THE.SMYRNAEAN.CHURCH.AGE_ JEFF.IN ROJC 185-227 TUESDAY_ 60-1206</ref> | ||
We have another example of William Branham's theology being all over the map as he also said exactly the opposite: | We have another example of William Branham's theology being all over the map as he also said exactly the opposite: | ||
"He that heareth My Word," Saint John 5:24, for instance. "He that heareth My Words and believeth on Him that sent Me, has Eternal Life." Or, King James puts it "everlasting," which is "Eternal," rightly. <ref>HE.CARES.DO.YOU.CARE_ JEFF.IN V-12 N-4 SUNDAY_ 63-0721</ref> | :''"He that heareth My Word," Saint John 5:24, for instance. "He that heareth My Words and believeth on Him that sent Me, has Eternal Life." Or, King James puts it "everlasting," which is "Eternal," rightly.'' <ref>HE.CARES.DO.YOU.CARE_ JEFF.IN V-12 N-4 SUNDAY_ 63-0721</ref> | ||
Let's look at what the Bible actually says: | Let's look at what the Bible actually says: | ||
And these shall go away into everlasting (αἰώνιον) punishment: but the righteous into life eternal (αἰώνιον).<ref>The Holy Bible: King James Version, Electronic Edition of the 1900 Authorized Version., Mt 25:46 (Bellingham, WA: Logos Research Systems, Inc., 2009).</ref> | :''And these shall go away into everlasting (αἰώνιον) punishment: but the righteous into life eternal (αἰώνιον).''<ref>The Holy Bible: King James Version, Electronic Edition of the 1900 Authorized Version., Mt 25:46 (Bellingham, WA: Logos Research Systems, Inc., 2009).</ref> | ||
The Greek word for everlasting and eternal in this verse is the same Greek word, which is why modern translation use the word "eternal" for both words in this verse. | The Greek word for everlasting and eternal in this verse is the same Greek word, which is why modern translation use the word "eternal" for both words in this verse. |
Revision as of 08:30, 31 May 2013
We have done our best to provide answers below on questions that have been emailed to us. Is there such a thing as eternal sonship?Please see our article on Eternal Sonship. What is the meaning of "begotten"?Question:In John 3:16 the bible says: "For God so loved the world that He sent his only begotten Son, so that whosoever believe in him should not perish but have Everlasting Life." I guess my question is: Does a Spirit have a beginning? But Jesus, was begotten. That must have happened sometime, whenever. And if the begotten Son occurred sometime, isn't it reasonable to assume he had a beginning. If the Son was begotten does it not mean that in fact the Son had a beginning and therefore the Father had a beginning but God, the creator is Eternal? Answer: There are a number of passages in the KJV in addition to john 3:16 that also use the term "begotten", including the following:
The word "begotten" used in these passages is the Greek word "μονογενής" (monogenés) which means pertaining to what is unique in the sense of being the only one of the same kind or class. For example, in Hebrews 11:17 it states "he who had received the promises presented his only son" or "… was ready to offer his only son". Abraham, of course, did have another son, Ishmael, and later sons by Keturah, but Isaac was a unique son in that he was a son born as the result of certain promises made by God. Accordingly, he could be called a μονογενής son, since he was the only one of his kind.[5] This is a clear example of the current inadequacy of some passages in the KJV. The above passages are translated completely differently in more modern translations:
The Son in the Old TestamentQuestion: Why, in the Old Testament is the existence of a Son not even mentioned in the same context as is in the New Testament? The Old Testament is filled with types and shadows of the New Testament. Israel was God’s son in the Old Testament dispensation (“Israel is My son, My firstborn” Ex. 4:22), and the experience of Israel’s testing in the wilderness there anticipates and foreshadows the testing of Jesus as the Son of God in the wilderness in the New Testament dispensation.[10] A CHILD BORN/A SON GIVEN
There are many other references to Christ in the Old Testament: ANOINTED ONE (MESSIAH)
BRANCH
IMMANUEL
GOD’S SERVANT
Robert T. France has summarized the servanthood of Jesus, as revealed in Isaiah.
The many chapters in Isaiah devoted to Jesus as God’s Servant make the title “Servant” one of the most significant of the names and titles of Jesus in the Old Testament. HOLY ONE
KING OF GLORY
MAN OF SORROWS
PRECIOUS CORNERSTONE/THE STONE THE BUILDER’S REJECTED/SURE FOUNDATION
PRINCE OF PRINCES
REPROACH OF MEN
RULER
SEED
STAR OUT OF JACOB
Eternal vs. EverlastingQuestion: Do the words, Everlasting and Eternal have the same meaning? Answer:: There are two words which are translated as "everlasting" - ἀΐδιος (aidios)and αἰώνιος (aionios). "Eternal" is also a translation from the Greek αἰώνιος (aionios) and ἀΐδιος (aidios) as well as αἰών (aion). William Branham taught that there was a difference between "everlasting" and "eternal":
We have another example of William Branham's theology being all over the map as he also said exactly the opposite:
Let's look at what the Bible actually says:
The Greek word for everlasting and eternal in this verse is the same Greek word, which is why modern translation use the word "eternal" for both words in this verse.
This is another clear case of william Branham's lazy or sloppy theology. Three PersonsThe concept of three "persons" in the Godhead also leave me with some more questions. When the bible says: Isaiah 46:9-10 New International Version (NIV) 9 Remember the former things, those of long ago; I am God, and there is no other; I am God, and there is none like me. 10 I make known the end from the beginning, from ancient times, what is still to come. I say, ‘My purpose will stand, and I will do all that I please.’ Then again in John 4:24 it says: John 4:24 New International Version (NIV) 24 God is spirit, and his worshipers must worship in the Spirit and in truth.”
These questions may seem silly, but it bothers me sometimes. God in three persons, blessed Trinity, the song says. But can a Spirit be a person?
References
|