The word for our day?
Here is a quote from a message follower:
- Jesus Christ is the Word for our day. God always uses man to bring His Word. That's a scriptural pattern.
Is this correct? Is that what the message of William Branham is? - the word for our day?
What William Branham taught
William Branham taught that what was good in the early church would not work today:
- The Word of Moses’ time did not work in the days of Jesus’ time. The work… the Word in the days of the apostles does not work in this day. It’s a promised Word for this day. They said themselves, and spoke it by the Holy Ghost, what would take place in the last days, how the churches would be heady, high-minded, how the whore would rise up and the harlots would be right with her, and how the…they would darken the earth. And the last church age, the Laodicea, Jesus would be completely taken from the church.[1]
William Branham believed that he had the "word for the hour" and that people could not be saved outside of his message:
- The anointed Word of God being vindicated before any man that’s born to be a son of God, with the predestinated germ into him for this hour, he’ll see God’s Message as sure as there’s a God in Heaven. Martin Luther saw It for his. Wesley saw It for his. The pentecostal saw It for his. Now what about you? Uh-huh. They went into a denomination. Here is the Word condemning it; telling you what we’re to have today, and just exactly Malachi 4 and all these other promises for the hour. What do you see? What are you looking at? Amen. Here we are. The real, genuine eagles hear. “My sheep know My Voice. A stranger they’ll not follow.”[2]
- No matter how much education, and how kind, how much you speak with tongues, how much kind, gentle, and everything you are; unless you accept that Word of the hour, when It’s manifested before you, you’re in the same predicament. That might sound crude, I don’t mean it that way, but it’s Truth. Just, just believe It, see. [3]
William Branham did not believe that all believers in Christ would go in the rapture. Only those that followed him go go in the rapture:
- Will all borned again believers go in the rapture? No, just the remnant, just the remnant, not all born again believers. The Bible said, “And the rest of the dead lived not for a thousand years,” and then they was raised and separated, the sheep from the goats. Not all borned again will go in the…according to Scripture.[4]
William Branham supported his concept of "the Word for this age" or "the Word for this day" by arguing that God foreknew all of history from the beginning and specifically divided or "allotted" portions of biblical prophecy to be fulfilled in distinct eras. He builds this doctrine using several key scriptural pillars:
1. The Word Comes Only to Prophets (John 10:35 & Amos 3:7) Branham relies heavily on Jesus' statement in John 10:35 that "the Word of God came" to the prophets. He couples this with Amos 3:7 to argue that God never acts without first revealing His plan to a prophet. Therefore, when it is time for the allotted Word of a specific age to be manifested, God always sends a prophet to the earth to make that specific Word live and be vindicated for that generation.
2. God Speaks in Sundry Times and Divers Manners (Hebrews 1:1) To prove that God has an unchanging pattern of sending a specific message for a specific time, Branham frequently quotes Hebrews 1:1, noting that "God in sundry times and divers manners spake to the fathers through the prophets". He uses this to show that God predestinates a specific messenger for each age, tailoring his nature and his message to perfectly meet the challenge of that particular day.
3. The Incompatibility of Past Messages Branham argues that the Word allotted for one age cannot be carried over into another age. He illustrates this logically by pointing out that Moses could not have brought Noah's message of building an ark, and Jesus could not have come bringing Moses' message. Similarly, the modern church cannot simply rely on the past messages of Martin Luther or John Wesley, because each age has its own distinct scriptural promises that must be fulfilled.
4. Christ as the Eternal, Unchanging Word (John 1:1 & Hebrews 13:8) Branham teaches that because "In the beginning was the Word" (John 1:1) and "Jesus Christ is the same yesterday, today, and forever" (Hebrews 13:8), the Word made manifest in any generation is Christ revealing Himself. He asserts that believers must not live in the "glare" of a past light or a historical movement, but must search the Scriptures to recognize the Word that is predestinated to be manifested in their own present hour. For instance, he states that John the Baptist was the "light of the hour" because his ministry brought to pass the very Word that God had spoken concerning him through Isaiah and Malachi.
5. Living by Every Word (Matthew 4:4) Finally, he points to Jesus' declaration that "Man shall not live by bread alone, but by every word that proceedeth out of the mouth of God". Branham insists that living by "every word" means recognizing and accepting the specific scriptural promises designated for the present day, rather than relying on man-made creeds or denominational traditions that obscure the "Word for this hour". To Branham, when God brings to pass the things He promised for a certain age, that is God acting as His own interpreter, requiring no human theology to explain it.
What the Bible teaches
William Branham’s concept of "the Word for this age" relies on a classic cultic methodology: tearing verses out of context, redefining biblical terms to fit a private theology, and establishing an extra-biblical source of authority. A careful, contextual examination of the Scriptures he uses demonstrates that his logic is fundamentally flawed and contradicts the very Bible he claims to preach.
William Branham's understanding of the "word for our day" was that a person must believe that William Branham was a prophet and if you don't believe that, then you don't have the Holy Spirit. However, that is complete and utter non-Biblical nonsense.
The message is simply a type of Christian conservatism which has been repeated throughout the history of Christianity. Its adherents say they are founded on scripture but their faith is really based on the "inspired" teachings of an "inspired" teacher.
A lot of people like this because it's simple. They don't have to think. They just have to believe what the "inspired" teacher says.
But that is not the Bible.
In 2 Peter 3:15, we read:
- Bear in mind that our Lord’s patience means salvation, just as our dear brother Paul also wrote you with the wisdom that God gave him. He writes the same way in all his letters, speaking in them of these matters. His letters contain some things that are hard to understand, which ignorant and unstable people distort, as they do the other Scriptures, to their own destruction.[5]
Peter says that some of Paul's teachings are hard to understand.
The writer of Hebrews states in chapter 5 that:
- We have much to say about this, but it is hard to make it clear to you because you no longer try to understand. In fact, though by this time you ought to be teachers, you need someone to teach you the elementary truths of God’s word all over again. You need milk, not solid food! Anyone who lives on milk, being still an infant, is not acquainted with the teaching about righteousness. 14 But solid food is for the mature, who by constant use have trained themselves to distinguish good from evil. [6]
We need to be adults. We need to think and consider and ponder God's word. We need to examine what William Branham taught very carefully and compare it to scripture.
The reason that so many have left the message of William Branahm is because of that. They have examined William Branham's message and compared it to the Bible. It failed.
Here is a detailed, point-by-point critique of his scriptural pillars based on the sources:
1. The Role of Prophets (John 10:35 & Amos 3:7) and Hebrews 1:1 Branham's reliance on Hebrews 1:1 to argue that God continues to send specific prophets with new messages for each age is a devastating misinterpretation caused by ignoring the very next verse. Hebrews 1:1-2 states: "God, who at various times and in various ways spoke in time past to the fathers by the prophets, has in these last days spoken to us by His Son".
When read in its full context, this passage teaches the exact opposite of Branham's doctrine. It proves that God's revelation through Jesus Christ is climactic and definitive. While God historically spoke through a succession of prophets, that era culminated and concluded with Christ, who is the final, supreme revelation of God. Furthermore, the Bible states that the church is "built upon the foundation of the apostles and prophets" (Ephesians 2:20). Because a foundation only needs to be laid once at the beginning of a building, the need for the work of another prophet arriving centuries later to deliver a new "Word" is definitely excluded. Therefore, any alleged prophet claiming to bring new, binding revelation after the completion of the New Testament must be considered a false prophet.
2. The "Incompatibility" of Past Messages Branham’s argument that messages of the past (such as those of Luther or Wesley) expire and cannot be carried over into a new age is an attempt to create an abrupt break with historic Christianity—a primary distinguishing mark of a cult.
The Scriptures teach that the Bible contains God's message "for all people for all time". The Book of Jude explicitly refutes the idea of evolving, era-specific messages by declaring that the faith "was once for all delivered to the saints" (Jude 1:3). There is no "allotted Word" waiting to be unlocked in the 20th century because the complete, infallible revelation of God was already delivered, finalized, and sealed.
3. Christ as the Unchanging Word (Hebrews 13:8) Branham misapplies Hebrews 13:8 ("Jesus Christ the same yesterday, today, and forever") to argue that Christ must manifest a new, distinct "Word" for each generation. In reality, this verse establishes the theological doctrine of Christ’s immutability—that His nature, His character, and His completed Gospel do not change over time.
Because Christ and His Word do not change, there is no need to search for a new "light of the hour." To argue that the modern church needs a new predestinated message is to add to the completed canon of Scripture, an offense strictly condemned in Revelation 22:18-19, which warns that God will add plagues to anyone who adds to the words of His prophecy.
4. Living by "Every Word" (Matthew 4:4) Branham’s insistence that "living by every word" means recognizing a newly designated message for the present day is a prime example of esoteric cultic exegesis. Cults frequently claim to possess special, hidden truths that orthodox believers missed. By forcing a "metaphysical" or "hidden" meaning onto a plain text, Branham violates the scriptural injunction to rightly handle the Word of God and not distort its meaning (2 Peter 3:16).
When Jesus said man must live by every word that proceeds from the mouth of God, He was quoting Deuteronomy and affirming the authority of the existing, objective Scriptures—not setting the stage for future prophets to invent new theologies. The Bible is completely sufficient for all instruction, reproof, and doctrine so that the believer may be "thoroughly equipped for every good work" (2 Timothy 3:16-17).
Conclusion Branham's logic is fatally flawed because it elevates his own private interpretations over the plain, historical, and contextual reading of the Bible. He uses Christian terminology but pours his own esoteric meanings into it. By asserting that God acts as "His own interpreter" to vindicate Branham's specific ministry, he reduces the ultimate authority of the Bible and replaces it with his own authority as a supposed prophet. The Scriptures definitively prove that God's final Word has already been spoken through Jesus Christ, and no new prophet or "Word for this age" is needed or biblically permitted.
Footnotes
- ↑ William Branham, 64-0112 - Shalom, para. 260
- ↑ william Braham, The Invisible Union Of The Bride Of Christ (65-1125), para. 240
- ↑ william Braham, Paradox (64-0206B), para. 232
- ↑ William Branham, Questions And Answers #2 (64-0823E), para. 211
- ↑ The New International Version (Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan, 2011), 2 Pe 3:15–16.
- ↑ The New International Version (Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan, 2011), Heb 5:11–14.