Jump to content

Eternal Sonship: Difference between revisions

Line 69: Line 69:
:''From the days of '''eternity'''.”<ref>New American Standard Bible: 1995 Update, Mic 5:2 (LaHabra, CA: The Lockman Foundation, 1995).</ref>
:''From the days of '''eternity'''.”<ref>New American Standard Bible: 1995 Update, Mic 5:2 (LaHabra, CA: The Lockman Foundation, 1995).</ref>


The major problem with William Branham's reasoning is that he puts God into time and space and, therefore, assumes that the Son had to have a beginning.  But based on the proof's above that the Son is eternal, then he exists outside of time and space, in fact, he created time and space and exists outside of both.  Beginnings and endings make no sense either in reference to God in the context of the Father or the Son.
'''The major problem with William Branham's reasoning is that he puts God into time and space and, therefore, assumes that the Son had to have a beginning.  But based on the proof's above that the Son is eternal, then he exists outside of time and space, in fact, he created time and space and exists outside of both.  Beginnings and endings make no sense either in reference to God in the context of the Father or the Son.'''


=Questions & Answers=
=Questions & Answers=