Jump to content

Eternal Sonship: Difference between revisions

no edit summary
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
An example of William Branham's [[Lazy Theology|lazy theology]] is his approach to the concept of the eternal sonship of Christ.
An example of William Branham's [[Lazy Theology|lazy theology]] is his approach to the concept of the eternal sonship of Christ.


=William Breanham's Position=
=William Branham's Position=


He ridiculed the idea throughout his ministry as being a Catholic doctrine:
He ridiculed the idea throughout his ministry as being a Catholic doctrine:
Line 36: Line 36:


O Eternal Father, send the Gospel Light across this city, through this coming week of convention. <ref>ONE.IN.A.MILLION_  LA.CA  V-18 N-1  SATURDAY_  65-0424 </ref>
O Eternal Father, send the Gospel Light across this city, through this coming week of convention. <ref>ONE.IN.A.MILLION_  LA.CA  V-18 N-1  SATURDAY_  65-0424 </ref>
=How can a Father be Eternal?==
Can a father be a father without a son?  To use William Branham's own reasoning, how can a father be eternal?  How could he be a father before he had a son?  However, if the Father is eternal, then why can't the Son be eternal likewise?
=The Scriptural Reasons for the Church's Historical Position=


<ref> </ref>
<ref> </ref>