Template:Bad Interpretation: Difference between revisions

    From BelieveTheSign
    No edit summary
    No edit summary
     
    (3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
    Line 1: Line 1:
    The following is a list of interpretive issues that William Branham got horribly wrong.  this is important because most message followers hold him out as an infallible interpreter of scripture.  If we want to know what a passage of the Bible actually means, William Branham is the best source on all counts.
    Most message followers consider William Branham to be an infallible interpreter of scripture.  It is the widely held view of message followers that, if we want to know what a passage of the Bible actually means, William Branham is the best source on all counts.


    In fact, message preachers generally encourage message followers that encounter a passage in scripture that seems to be at odds with William branham'sinterpretation to simply put it "[[Off The Shelf|on the shelf]]" until God reveals to them why William bRanham has the correct view.
    When encountering a passage in scripture that seems to be at odds with William Branham's interpretation, message preachers generally encourage message followers to simply put it "[[Off The Shelf|on the shelf]]" until God reveals to them why William Branham has the correct view.


    But here are a number of biblical issues that William Branham seems to have messed up badly:
    But there are a number of biblical issues that William Branham seems to have messed up badly:


    *[[Did God change Saul's name to Paul?]]
    *[[Did God change Saul's name to Paul?]]
    Line 10: Line 10:
    *[[King Saul - The Peoples' Choice?|Was King Saul the people’s choice by democratic vote?]]
    *[[King Saul - The Peoples' Choice?|Was King Saul the people’s choice by democratic vote?]]
    *[[Temporary Salvation|Can you lose your salvation?]]
    *[[Temporary Salvation|Can you lose your salvation?]]
    *[[Lilies Do Not Toil|How hard do lillies work?]]
    *[[Lilies Do Not Toil|How hard do lilies work?]]
    *[[The Reason John Wept|Did John weep for joy or because no one was worthy?]]
    *[[The Reason John Wept|Did John weep for joy or because no one was worthy?]]
    *[[Women were designed by Satan|Were Women were designed by Satan?]]
    *[[Women were designed by Satan|Were Women were designed by Satan?]]
    Line 16: Line 16:
    *[[Michael the Archangel|Is Jesus really Michael the Archangel?]]
    *[[Michael the Archangel|Is Jesus really Michael the Archangel?]]


    You are currently on the article that is in bold.<br>
    You are currently on the article that is in bold.
    <br>

    Latest revision as of 02:48, 26 August 2018

    Most message followers consider William Branham to be an infallible interpreter of scripture. It is the widely held view of message followers that, if we want to know what a passage of the Bible actually means, William Branham is the best source on all counts.

    When encountering a passage in scripture that seems to be at odds with William Branham's interpretation, message preachers generally encourage message followers to simply put it "on the shelf" until God reveals to them why William Branham has the correct view.

    But there are a number of biblical issues that William Branham seems to have messed up badly:

    You are currently on the article that is in bold.