The September 2020 Debate - Part 2 - Revision history

Admin: /* Audio Podcast */

2021-04-11T03:57:59Z

Audio Podcast

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:57, 11 April 2021
Line 3:		Line 3:
	=Audio Podcast=		=Audio Podcast=

	Click [http://offtheshelf.life/podcast/~~episode~~-69-the-2020-debate-part-3/ here to listen to part 2 of the Debate on the Off The Shelf podcast].		Click [http://offtheshelf.life/podcast/ots-68-the-2020-debate-part-2/ here to listen to part 2 of the Debate on the Off The Shelf podcast].

	=Video=		=Video=

Admin at 03:56, 11 April 2021

2021-04-11T03:56:10Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:56, 11 April 2021
Line 1:		Line 1:
	{{Top of Page}}		{{Top of Page}}

	=~~Part 1 of the Debate -~~ Podcast=		=Audio Podcast=

	Click [http://offtheshelf.life/podcast/episode-69-the-2020-debate-part-3/ here to listen to part 2 of the Debate on the Off The Shelf podcast].		Click [http://offtheshelf.life/podcast/episode-69-the-2020-debate-part-3/ here to listen to part 2 of the Debate on the Off The Shelf podcast].

	=~~Part 2 of the Debate -~~ Video=		=Video=

	<youtube width="250">https://youtu.be/cpO-uJ1Tum8</youtube>		<youtube width="250">https://youtu.be/cpO-uJ1Tum8</youtube>

Admin at 03:54, 11 April 2021

2021-04-11T03:54:54Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:54, 11 April 2021
Line 1:		Line 1:
	{{Top of Page}}		{{Top of Page}}

			=Part 1 of the Debate - Podcast=

			Click [http://offtheshelf.life/podcast/episode-69-the-2020-debate-part-3/ here to listen to part 2 of the Debate on the Off The Shelf podcast].

			=Part 2 of the Debate - Video=

	<youtube width="250">https://youtu.be/cpO-uJ1Tum8</youtube>		<youtube width="250">https://youtu.be/cpO-uJ1Tum8</youtube>

Admin: /* Transcript */

2021-03-22T18:49:21Z

Transcript

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:49, 22 March 2021
Line 119:		Line 119:
	I buy men's pants. If I were women's pants, then I would be cross-dressing. But a woman wearing women's pants is not. Paul tells us that women should dress modestly. I've seen women in the message wearing dresses that were [00:16:00] immodest, and I've seen non-message women wearing pants that were modest.		I buy men's pants. If I were women's pants, then I would be cross-dressing. But a woman wearing women's pants is not. Paul tells us that women should dress modestly. I've seen women in the message wearing dresses that were [00:16:00] immodest, and I've seen non-message women wearing pants that were modest.

	If you have a problem with the latter, I honestly don't think you understand the new covenant. I don't think you understand the gospel. The second issue you brought up, which is completely unrelated, is that of trans genderism. Now I take it from your question that you'd like me to condemn people who are transgender, but honestly that is not what I'm called to as a Christian.		If you have a problem with the latter, I honestly don't think you understand the new covenant. I don't think you understand the gospel. The second issue you brought up, which is completely unrelated, is that of trans-genderism. Now I take it from your question that you'd like me to condemn people who are transgender, but honestly that is not what I'm called to as a Christian.

	Our responsibility as Christians is not to condemn sinners. In fact, I read in John 3:17 that God did not send his son into the world to condemn the world, but to save the world through him. To the women caught in the midst of adultery, Jesus declared, neither do I condemn you, go now and leave your life of sin.		Our responsibility as Christians is not to condemn sinners. In fact, I read in John 3:17 that God did not send his son into the world to condemn the world, but to save the world through him. To the women caught in the midst of adultery, Jesus declared, neither do I condemn you, go now and leave your life of sin.

Admin: /* Transcript */

2021-03-22T18:35:37Z

Transcript

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:35, 22 March 2021
Line 17:		Line 17:
	But what I would ask about your support of the King James version, only position, how do you support this? Given that first, the underlying Greek manuscript on which the King James version is based, which is called the TextUs Receptus. It was produced by Erasmus, a Roman Catholic monk. And I know people in the message really don't like the Roman [00:01:00] Catholic church.		But what I would ask about your support of the King James version, only position, how do you support this? Given that first, the underlying Greek manuscript on which the King James version is based, which is called the TextUs Receptus. It was produced by Erasmus, a Roman Catholic monk. And I know people in the message really don't like the Roman [00:01:00] Catholic church.

	The ~~TextUs~~ Receptus was based on six, quite late incomplete Greek manuscripts. Where there were holes in the final manuscripts, ~~Erasumus~~ back-filled the Textus Receptus by translating parts of the Latin Vulgate into Greek.		The Textus Receptus was based on six, quite late incomplete Greek manuscripts. Where there were holes in the final manuscripts, Erasmus back-filled the Textus Receptus by translating parts of the Latin Vulgate into Greek.
	Since the Textus... that's hard to say really fast. Since the Textus Receptus was completed by Erasmus in 1516, there have been over 5,800 Greek manuscripts that have been discovered, some dating back to the early second century. But the Textus Receptus ignores them. So how do you support your stance with respect to the King James version and the Textus Receptus.		Since the Textus... that's hard to say really fast. Since the Textus Receptus was completed by Erasmus in 1516, there have been over 5,800 Greek manuscripts that have been discovered, some dating back to the early second century. But the Textus Receptus ignores them. So how do you support your stance with respect to the King James version and the Textus Receptus.

Admin: /* Transcript */

2021-03-22T18:34:51Z

Transcript

Show changes

Admin at 05:12, 22 March 2021

2021-03-22T05:12:43Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:12, 22 March 2021
Line 1:		Line 1:
	{{Top of Page}}		{{Top of Page}}
			<youtube width="250">https://youtu.be/cpO-uJ1Tum8</youtube>

	~~<youtube width="250">https://youtu.be/cpO-uJ1Tum8</youtube>~~		{{The 2020 Debate}}

	=Transcript=		=Transcript=

Admin at 05:02, 22 March 2021

2021-03-22T05:02:33Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:02, 22 March 2021
Line 1:		Line 1:
	{{Top of Page}}		{{Top of Page}}

	~~=The Debate - Part 2=~~
	<youtube width="250">https://youtu.be/cpO-uJ1Tum8</youtube>		<youtube width="250">https://youtu.be/cpO-uJ1Tum8</youtube>

Admin: Created page with "{{Top of Page}} =The Debate - Part 2= https://youtu.be/cpO-uJ1Tum8 =Transcript= {{Bottom of Page No Ref}}"

2021-03-22T05:01:57Z

Created page with "{{Top of Page}} =The Debate - Part 2= <youtube width="250">https://youtu.be/cpO-uJ1Tum8</youtube> =Transcript= {{Bottom of Page No Ref}}"

New page

{{Top of Page}}

=The Debate - Part 2=
<youtube width="250">https://youtu.be/cpO-uJ1Tum8</youtube>

=Transcript=

{{Bottom of Page No Ref}}