Supernatural photographs - Revision history

Admin: /* Pillar of Fire on his shoulder? */

2021-04-15T22:46:47Z

Pillar of Fire on his shoulder?

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:46, 15 April 2021
Line 22:		Line 22:
	<p><span style="background:#FFF;color:#000;text-decoration:overline"><u>[[File:Pillar of fire shoulder low res.png\|250px\|top]]</u></span></p>		<p><span style="background:#FFF;color:#000;text-decoration:overline"><u>[[File:Pillar of fire shoulder low res.png\|250px\|top]]</u></span></p>

	Please note the door is slight ajar in the top left of the photograph letting in a small stream of light which hits William Branham on his shoulder ~~with a very small amount spilling onto his tie~~.		Please note the door is slight ajar in the top left of the photograph letting in a small stream of light which hits William Branham on his shoulder.

	'''The conclusion:''' There is a light on William Branham's shoulder, but it is sunlight. There is nothing supernatural about this photograph.		'''The conclusion:''' There is a light on William Branham's shoulder, but it is sunlight. There is nothing supernatural about this photograph.

Admin: /* The Pillar of Fire with Joseph Branham */

2020-03-03T17:11:20Z

The Pillar of Fire with Joseph Branham

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:11, 3 March 2020
Line 9:		Line 9:

	<p><span style="background:#FFF;color:#000;text-decoration:overline"><u>[[File:WMB and JB on rock.jpg\|250px\|top]]</u></span></p>		<p><span style="background:#FFF;color:#000;text-decoration:overline"><u>[[File:WMB and JB on rock.jpg\|250px\|top]]</u></span></p>

	~~If you are interested in whether this video is, in fact, supernatural, we would recommend watching the following video in which Pearry Green provides details on this video.~~

	~~<youtube>http://youtu.be/VS2CI6INFh8</youtube>~~

	~~This video was produced by [[Research Sources for William Branham and His Message#Websites\|Seek The Truth]]~~

	'''The conclusion:''' The photograph of William Branham and his son Joseph does not contain anything other than light bleed from a defective camera.		'''The conclusion:''' The photograph of William Branham and his son Joseph does not contain anything other than light bleed from a defective camera.

Admin at 00:36, 20 April 2019

2019-04-20T00:36:17Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:36, 20 April 2019
Line 12:		Line 12:
	If you are interested in whether this video is, in fact, supernatural, we would recommend watching the following video in which Pearry Green provides details on this video.		If you are interested in whether this video is, in fact, supernatural, we would recommend watching the following video in which Pearry Green provides details on this video.

	<~~mediaplayer~~>http://youtu.be/VS2CI6INFh8</~~mediaplayer~~>		<youtube>http://youtu.be/VS2CI6INFh8</youtube>

	This video was produced by [[Research Sources for William Branham and His Message#Websites\|Seek The Truth]]		This video was produced by [[Research Sources for William Branham and His Message#Websites\|Seek The Truth]]

Admin at 03:18, 27 August 2015

2015-08-27T03:18:04Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:18, 27 August 2015
Line 98:		Line 98:

	{{Bottom of Page}}		{{Bottom of Page}}
			[[Category:William Branham pointing to himself]]
			[[Category:Critical analysis of William Branham‏‎]]
			[[Category:The Message]]
			[[Category:Supernatural vindication‏]]‎
			[[Category:Honesty and Credibility]]
			[[Category:The Weird]]

Admin at 07:41, 8 July 2015

2015-07-08T07:41:01Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:41, 8 July 2015
Line 48:		Line 48:
	[[File:Analogue Double Exposure Photography of Pre-Wedding.jpg\|250px\|top]]		[[File:Analogue Double Exposure Photography of Pre-Wedding.jpg\|250px\|top]]

	'''The conclusion:''' The picture of William Branham with the streaks of light is an accidental double exposure, something that was fairly easy to do accidentally on the cheap cameras that were common in the 1950's and 1960's.~~[[File:Pillar_of_Fire_smallpic.jpg\|right\|]]~~		'''The conclusion:''' The picture of William Branham with the streaks of light is an accidental double exposure, something that was fairly easy to do accidentally on the cheap cameras that were common in the 1950's and 1960's.

	=Houston photograph=		=Houston photograph=
			[[File:Pillar_of_Fire_smallpic.jpg\|right\|]]
	[[The Houston Photograph\|The iconic image of William Branham in the Sam Houston Coliseum]] has an entire article on this website devoted to it.		[[The Houston Photograph\|The iconic image of William Branham in the Sam Houston Coliseum]] has an entire article on this website devoted to it.

Line 58:		Line 58:
	The picture below is available from Voice of God Recordings for purchase. The original photograph was taken in Houston, TX by Douglas Studios on January 24, 1950. However, the original photograph was black and white and therefore the photo below has been manipulated to add colour.		The picture below is available from Voice of God Recordings for purchase. The original photograph was taken in Houston, TX by Douglas Studios on January 24, 1950. However, the original photograph was black and white and therefore the photo below has been manipulated to add colour.

	~~<p><span style="background:#FFF;color:#000;text-decoration:overline"><u>~~[[File:WMB colour Halo.jpg\|250px\|top]]~~</u></span></p>~~		[[File:WMB colour Halo.jpg\|250px\|top]]

	William Branham was adamant that this picture was supernatural in nature. But there are a number of problems with the statement that the photograph is of the pillar of fire.		William Branham was adamant that this picture was supernatural in nature. But there are a number of problems with the statement that the photograph is of the pillar of fire.
Line 64:		Line 64:
	If the light passed through the lens and struck the film, why did know one else in the auditorium see the light. Could it be that the light was seen by everyone but just not from the specific angle of the camera. It should be added that a flood light bank would appear "blown out" on a normal exposure of a portrait photograph such as that of William Branham. Here are other example of flood lamps in a stage setting. Notice the similarities with tthe "pillar of fire in the Houston photograph.		If the light passed through the lens and struck the film, why did know one else in the auditorium see the light. Could it be that the light was seen by everyone but just not from the specific angle of the camera. It should be added that a flood light bank would appear "blown out" on a normal exposure of a portrait photograph such as that of William Branham. Here are other example of flood lamps in a stage setting. Notice the similarities with tthe "pillar of fire in the Houston photograph.

	~~<p><span style="background:#FFF;color:#000;"><u>~~[[File:Beatles with Ed Sullivan.jpg\|250px\|top]] [[File:ED SULLIVAN floodlights 2.jpg\|250px\|top]]~~</u></span></p>~~		[[File:Beatles with Ed Sullivan.jpg\|250px\|top]]<br>
			<br>
			[[File:ED SULLIVAN floodlights 2.jpg\|250px\|top]]

	For more details on this photograph, please see our article on [[The Houston Photograph]].		For more details on this photograph, please see our article on [[The Houston Photograph]].
Line 74:		Line 76:
	Sometime in 1955, a series of three pictures was taken in Germany. William Branham stated that the light in the photographs was the angel of the Lord and that scientists had attested to the fact that the light in the photographs was supernatural in nature.		Sometime in 1955, a series of three pictures was taken in Germany. William Branham stated that the light in the photographs was the angel of the Lord and that scientists had attested to the fact that the light in the photographs was supernatural in nature.

	~~<p><span style="background:#FFF;color:#000;"><u>~~[[File:Flash in Switzerland 2.jpg\|250px\|top]] [[File:Flash in Switzerland 3.jpg\|250px\|top]] [[File:Flash in Switzerland.jpg\|250px\|top]]~~</u></span></p>~~		[[File:Flash in Switzerland 2.jpg\|250px\|top]]<br>
			<br>
			[[File:Flash in Switzerland 3.jpg\|250px\|top]]<br>
			<br>
			[[File:Flash in Switzerland.jpg\|250px\|top]]

	The light that is reflected from the glass on the far wall is obviously that of a flash from the camera that took the picture. Again, anyone that is familiar with photography can spot this in an instant. Here are a couple of examples that we found on the internet.		The light that is reflected from the glass on the far wall is obviously that of a flash from the camera that took the picture. Again, anyone that is familiar with photography can spot this in an instant. Here are a couple of examples that we found on the internet.

	~~<p><span style="background:#FFF;color:#000;"><u>~~[[File:Flash in the mirror.png\|250px\|top]] [[File:Flash in the mirror 2.jpg\|250px\|top]] ~~</u></span></p>~~		[[File:Flash in the mirror.png\|250px\|top]]<br>
			<br>
			[[File:Flash in the mirror 2.jpg\|250px\|top]]

	'''The conclusion:''' The light on the far wall was simply a reflection of the photographer's flash. The light was not supernatural.		'''The conclusion:''' The light on the far wall was simply a reflection of the photographer's flash. The light was not supernatural.

Admin: /* The Fire of God? */

2015-07-08T07:38:34Z

The Fire of God?

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:38, 8 July 2015
Line 36:		Line 36:
	The following two photographs are available for purchase from [[Voice of God Recordings]] and are entitled "Brother Branham Preaching Just Before The Fire Of God Appeared" and "The Fire Of God Surrounding Bro. Branham As He Is Preaching", respectively. These colour photographs were taken in 1958 in Lakeport, California.		The following two photographs are available for purchase from [[Voice of God Recordings]] and are entitled "Brother Branham Preaching Just Before The Fire Of God Appeared" and "The Fire Of God Surrounding Bro. Branham As He Is Preaching", respectively. These colour photographs were taken in 1958 in Lakeport, California.

	~~<p><span style="background:#FFF;color:#000;"><u>~~[[File:WMB preaching before double exposure.jpg\|250px\|top]] [[File:WMB preaching double exposure.jpg\|250px\|top]]~~</u></span></p>~~		[[File:WMB preaching before double exposure.jpg\|250px\|top]]<br>
			<br>
			[[File:WMB preaching double exposure.jpg\|250px\|top]]

	It is clear to anyone that has the slightest knowledge of photography that the second photograph is a "double exposure" (that is, a superimposition of two exposures to create a single image) photograph. Additionally, the camera was moved in the second exposure using a fairly slow shutter speed. This is indicated by the multiple streaks of light that are duplicated in the photograph.		It is clear to anyone that has the slightest knowledge of photography that the second photograph is a "double exposure" (that is, a superimposition of two exposures to create a single image) photograph. Additionally, the camera was moved in the second exposure using a fairly slow shutter speed. This is indicated by the multiple streaks of light that are duplicated in the photograph.
Line 42:		Line 44:
	Here are a couple of examples of what happens when a the camera is moved while directed at several point sources of light. Notice the similarities to the streaks of light in the "supernatural photo" of William Branham.		Here are a couple of examples of what happens when a the camera is moved while directed at several point sources of light. Notice the similarities to the streaks of light in the "supernatural photo" of William Branham.

	~~<p><span style="background:#FFF;color:#000;"><u>~~[[File:Multiple exposure 1.jpg\|250px\|top]] [[File:Analogue Double Exposure Photography of Pre-Wedding.jpg\|250px\|top]]~~</u></span></p>~~		[[File:Multiple exposure 1.jpg\|250px\|top]]<br>
			<br>
			[[File:Analogue Double Exposure Photography of Pre-Wedding.jpg\|250px\|top]]

	'''The conclusion:''' The picture of William Branham with the streaks of light is an accidental double exposure, something that was fairly easy to do accidentally on the cheap cameras that were common in the 1950's and 1960's.[[File:Pillar_of_Fire_smallpic.jpg\|right\|]]		'''The conclusion:''' The picture of William Branham with the streaks of light is an accidental double exposure, something that was fairly easy to do accidentally on the cheap cameras that were common in the 1950's and 1960's.[[File:Pillar_of_Fire_smallpic.jpg\|right\|]]

Admin at 07:35, 8 July 2015

2015-07-08T07:35:52Z

Admin at 07:11, 6 August 2014

2014-08-06T07:11:00Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:11, 6 August 2014
Line 15:		Line 15:

	This video was produced by [[Research Sources for William Branham and His Message#Websites\|Seek The Truth]]		This video was produced by [[Research Sources for William Branham and His Message#Websites\|Seek The Truth]]

			'''The conclusion:''' The photograph of William Branham and his son Joseph does not contain anything other than light bleed from a defective camera.

	=Pillar of Fire on his shoulder?=		=Pillar of Fire on his shoulder?=
Line 28:		Line 30:
	Please note the door is slight ajar in the top left of the photograph letting in a small stream of light which hits William Branham on his shoulder with a very small amount spilling onto his tie.		Please note the door is slight ajar in the top left of the photograph letting in a small stream of light which hits William Branham on his shoulder with a very small amount spilling onto his tie.

	There is a light on ~~his~~ shoulder but it is sunlight. There is nothing supernatural about this photograph.		'''The conclusion:''' There is a light on William Branham's shoulder, but it is sunlight. There is nothing supernatural about this photograph.

	=The Fire of God?=		=The Fire of God?=
Line 61:		Line 63:

	For more details on this photograph, please see our article on [[The Houston Photograph]].		For more details on this photograph, please see our article on [[The Houston Photograph]].

			'''The conclusion:''' The light above William Branham's head was photographed but it was not a supernatural phenomenon. It was simply a flood lamp in the auditorium.

	=The Angel of the Lord in Germany=		=The Angel of the Lord in Germany=
Line 71:		Line 75:

	<p><span style="background:#FFF;color:#000;"><u>[[File:Flash in the mirror.png\|330px\|top]] [[File:Flash in the mirror 2.jpg\|350px\|top]] </u></span></p>		<p><span style="background:#FFF;color:#000;"><u>[[File:Flash in the mirror.png\|330px\|top]] [[File:Flash in the mirror 2.jpg\|350px\|top]] </u></span></p>

			'''The conclusion:''' The light on the far wall was simply a reflection of the photographer's flash. The light was not supernatural.

	=Quotes of William Branham=		=Quotes of William Branham=

Admin at 07:07, 6 August 2014

2014-08-06T07:07:18Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:07, 6 August 2014
Line 62:		Line 62:
	For more details on this photograph, please see our article on [[The Houston Photograph]].		For more details on this photograph, please see our article on [[The Houston Photograph]].

			=The Angel of the Lord in Germany=

			Sometime in 1955, a series of three pictures was taken in Germany. William Branham stated that the light in the photographs was the angel of the Lord and that scientists had attested to the fact that the light in the photographs was supernatural in nature.

	File:Flash in Switzerland.jpg		<p><span style="background:#FFF;color:#000;"><u>[[File:Flash in Switzerland 2.jpg\|250px\|top]] [[File:Flash in Switzerland 3.jpg\|250px\|top]] [[File:Flash in Switzerland.jpg\|250px\|top]]</u></span></p>

			The light that is reflected from the glass on the far wall is obviously that of a flash from the camera that took the picture. Again, anyone that is familiar with photography can spot this in an instant. Here are a couple of examples that we found on the internet.

			<p><span style="background:#FFF;color:#000;"><u>[[File:Flash in the mirror.png\|330px\|top]] [[File:Flash in the mirror 2.jpg\|350px\|top]] </u></span></p>

	=Quotes of William Branham=		=Quotes of William Branham=

			This was by the FBI, fingerprint and document; here it is, the same Pillar of Fire that led the children of Israel. It's in Washington, DC as the only supernatural Being was ever photographed. Germany, got it three times in Germany with their camera last year, coming down, giving the discernment and going back. And George J. Lacy, the head of the FBI fingerprint and document, examined this. There's his write-up on it. See? It's the... That same Angel is not two foot from where I'm standing right now. What is it? It's the Pillar of Fire that led the children of Israel.<ref>THE.DOOR.OF.THE.DOOR_ NEWARK.NJ THURSDAY_ 57-1212</ref>

			And I remember when It spoke to me as a little boy, and down through life how I described It years before they ever took the picture of It. And now, they've got three official pictures of It: one from Germany and two from the United States, of the picture of the Angel of the Lord which scientists of Germany and scientists of the United States has put their seal upon it, that It's a supernatural Being, described just exactly, that Pillar of Fire.
			To my opinion, and if I'm wrong God forgive me, and as your brother, I think It's the same Pillar of Fire that led the children of Israel. I'm not saying that because It had Its picture taken with me; because It's not to me, It's to the Church, the entire Church.<ref>THE.QUEEN.OF.SHEBA_ CHICAGO.IL TUESDAY_ 58-0107</ref>

	{{Bottom of Page}}		{{Bottom of Page}}

Admin: /* Houston photograph */

2014-08-06T06:40:26Z

Houston photograph

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:40, 6 August 2014
Line 61:		Line 61:

	For more details on this photograph, please see our article on [[The Houston Photograph]].		For more details on this photograph, please see our article on [[The Houston Photograph]].



			File:Flash in Switzerland.jpg

	=Quotes of William Branham=		=Quotes of William Branham=

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:35, 8 July 2015
Line 8:		Line 8:
	Below is a photograph that is available for purchase from [[Voice of God Recordings]] entitled "Pillar Of Fire On The Rock Under Brother Branham and his son, Joseph". The picture was supposedly taken at Sunset Mountain in Arizona on May 19, 1965. however, it is more likely that the picture was taken at [[Rattlesnake Mesa]].		Below is a photograph that is available for purchase from [[Voice of God Recordings]] entitled "Pillar Of Fire On The Rock Under Brother Branham and his son, Joseph". The picture was supposedly taken at Sunset Mountain in Arizona on May 19, 1965. however, it is more likely that the picture was taken at [[Rattlesnake Mesa]].

	<p><span style="background:#FFF;color:#000;text-decoration:overline"><u>[[File:WMB and JB on rock.jpg\|~~300px~~\|top]]</u></span></p>		<p><span style="background:#FFF;color:#000;text-decoration:overline"><u>[[File:WMB and JB on rock.jpg\|250px\|top]]</u></span></p>

	If you are interested in whether this video is, in fact, supernatural, we would recommend watching the following video in which Pearry Green provides details on this video.		If you are interested in whether this video is, in fact, supernatural, we would recommend watching the following video in which Pearry Green provides details on this video.

	<mediaplayer ~~width='800' height='500'~~>http://youtu.be/VS2CI6INFh8</mediaplayer>		<mediaplayer>http://youtu.be/VS2CI6INFh8</mediaplayer>

	This video was produced by [[Research Sources for William Branham and His Message#Websites\|Seek The Truth]]		This video was produced by [[Research Sources for William Branham and His Message#Websites\|Seek The Truth]]
Line 22:		Line 22:
	Here is the photo that is available for purchase from [[Voice of God Recordings]] entitled "Pillar Of Fire Over Brother Branham's Shoulder". It is a black & white photograph that was taken in March, 1964, at Soul's Harbor Temple in Dallas, Texas.		Here is the photo that is available for purchase from [[Voice of God Recordings]] entitled "Pillar Of Fire Over Brother Branham's Shoulder". It is a black & white photograph that was taken in March, 1964, at Soul's Harbor Temple in Dallas, Texas.

	<p><span style="background:#FFF;color:#000;text-decoration:overline"><u>[[File:Pillar of fire shoulder VoGR.jpg\|~~300px~~\|top]]</u></span></p>		<p><span style="background:#FFF;color:#000;text-decoration:overline"><u>[[File:Pillar of fire shoulder VoGR.jpg\|250px\|top]]</u></span></p>

	The problem is that '''the picture sold by Voice of God Recordings has been cropped'''. The original of the photograph is displayed below:		The problem is that '''the picture sold by Voice of God Recordings has been cropped'''. The original of the photograph is displayed below:

	<p><span style="background:#FFF;color:#000;text-decoration:overline"><u>[[File:Pillar of fire shoulder low res.png\|~~300px~~\|top]]</u></span></p>		<p><span style="background:#FFF;color:#000;text-decoration:overline"><u>[[File:Pillar of fire shoulder low res.png\|250px\|top]]</u></span></p>

	Please note the door is slight ajar in the top left of the photograph letting in a small stream of light which hits William Branham on his shoulder with a very small amount spilling onto his tie.		Please note the door is slight ajar in the top left of the photograph letting in a small stream of light which hits William Branham on his shoulder with a very small amount spilling onto his tie.
Line 36:		Line 36:
	The following two photographs are available for purchase from [[Voice of God Recordings]] and are entitled "Brother Branham Preaching Just Before The Fire Of God Appeared" and "The Fire Of God Surrounding Bro. Branham As He Is Preaching", respectively. These colour photographs were taken in 1958 in Lakeport, California.		The following two photographs are available for purchase from [[Voice of God Recordings]] and are entitled "Brother Branham Preaching Just Before The Fire Of God Appeared" and "The Fire Of God Surrounding Bro. Branham As He Is Preaching", respectively. These colour photographs were taken in 1958 in Lakeport, California.

	<p><span style="background:#FFF;color:#000;"><u>[[File:WMB preaching before double exposure.jpg\|~~300px~~\|top]] [[File:WMB preaching double exposure.jpg\|~~300px~~\|top]]</u></span></p>		<p><span style="background:#FFF;color:#000;"><u>[[File:WMB preaching before double exposure.jpg\|250px\|top]] [[File:WMB preaching double exposure.jpg\|250px\|top]]</u></span></p>

	It is clear to anyone that has the slightest knowledge of photography that the second photograph is a "double exposure" (that is, a superimposition of two exposures to create a single image) photograph. Additionally, the camera was moved in the second exposure using a fairly slow shutter speed. This is indicated by the multiple streaks of light that are duplicated in the photograph.		It is clear to anyone that has the slightest knowledge of photography that the second photograph is a "double exposure" (that is, a superimposition of two exposures to create a single image) photograph. Additionally, the camera was moved in the second exposure using a fairly slow shutter speed. This is indicated by the multiple streaks of light that are duplicated in the photograph.
Line 42:		Line 42:
	Here are a couple of examples of what happens when a the camera is moved while directed at several point sources of light. Notice the similarities to the streaks of light in the "supernatural photo" of William Branham.		Here are a couple of examples of what happens when a the camera is moved while directed at several point sources of light. Notice the similarities to the streaks of light in the "supernatural photo" of William Branham.

	<p><span style="background:#FFF;color:#000;"><u>[[File:Multiple exposure 1.jpg\|~~400px~~\|top]] [[File:Analogue Double Exposure Photography of Pre-Wedding.jpg\|~~300px~~\|top]]</u></span></p>		<p><span style="background:#FFF;color:#000;"><u>[[File:Multiple exposure 1.jpg\|250px\|top]] [[File:Analogue Double Exposure Photography of Pre-Wedding.jpg\|250px\|top]]</u></span></p>

	'''The conclusion:''' The picture of William Branham with the streaks of light is an accidental double exposure, something that was fairly easy to do accidentally on the cheap cameras that were common in the 1950's and 1960's.[[File:Pillar_of_Fire_smallpic.jpg\|right\|]]		'''The conclusion:''' The picture of William Branham with the streaks of light is an accidental double exposure, something that was fairly easy to do accidentally on the cheap cameras that were common in the 1950's and 1960's.[[File:Pillar_of_Fire_smallpic.jpg\|right\|]]
Line 54:		Line 54:
	The picture below is available from Voice of God Recordings for purchase. The original photograph was taken in Houston, TX by Douglas Studios on January 24, 1950. However, the original photograph was black and white and therefore the photo below has been manipulated to add colour.		The picture below is available from Voice of God Recordings for purchase. The original photograph was taken in Houston, TX by Douglas Studios on January 24, 1950. However, the original photograph was black and white and therefore the photo below has been manipulated to add colour.

	<p><span style="background:#FFF;color:#000;text-decoration:overline"><u>[[File:WMB colour Halo.jpg\|~~600px~~\|top]]</u></span></p>		<p><span style="background:#FFF;color:#000;text-decoration:overline"><u>[[File:WMB colour Halo.jpg\|250px\|top]]</u></span></p>

	William Branham was adamant that this picture was supernatural in nature. But there are a number of problems with the statement that the photograph is of the pillar of fire.		William Branham was adamant that this picture was supernatural in nature. But there are a number of problems with the statement that the photograph is of the pillar of fire.
Line 60:		Line 60:
	If the light passed through the lens and struck the film, why did know one else in the auditorium see the light. Could it be that the light was seen by everyone but just not from the specific angle of the camera. It should be added that a flood light bank would appear "blown out" on a normal exposure of a portrait photograph such as that of William Branham. Here are other example of flood lamps in a stage setting. Notice the similarities with tthe "pillar of fire in the Houston photograph.		If the light passed through the lens and struck the film, why did know one else in the auditorium see the light. Could it be that the light was seen by everyone but just not from the specific angle of the camera. It should be added that a flood light bank would appear "blown out" on a normal exposure of a portrait photograph such as that of William Branham. Here are other example of flood lamps in a stage setting. Notice the similarities with tthe "pillar of fire in the Houston photograph.

	<p><span style="background:#FFF;color:#000;"><u>[[File:Beatles with Ed Sullivan.jpg\|~~350px~~\|top]] [[File:ED SULLIVAN floodlights 2.jpg\|~~400px~~\|top]]</u></span></p>		<p><span style="background:#FFF;color:#000;"><u>[[File:Beatles with Ed Sullivan.jpg\|250px\|top]] [[File:ED SULLIVAN floodlights 2.jpg\|250px\|top]]</u></span></p>

	For more details on this photograph, please see our article on [[The Houston Photograph]].		For more details on this photograph, please see our article on [[The Houston Photograph]].
Line 74:		Line 74:
	The light that is reflected from the glass on the far wall is obviously that of a flash from the camera that took the picture. Again, anyone that is familiar with photography can spot this in an instant. Here are a couple of examples that we found on the internet.		The light that is reflected from the glass on the far wall is obviously that of a flash from the camera that took the picture. Again, anyone that is familiar with photography can spot this in an instant. Here are a couple of examples that we found on the internet.

	<p><span style="background:#FFF;color:#000;"><u>[[File:Flash in the mirror.png\|~~330px~~\|top]] [[File:Flash in the mirror 2.jpg\|~~350px~~\|top]] </u></span></p>		<p><span style="background:#FFF;color:#000;"><u>[[File:Flash in the mirror.png\|250px\|top]] [[File:Flash in the mirror 2.jpg\|250px\|top]] </u></span></p>

	'''The conclusion:''' The light on the far wall was simply a reflection of the photographer's flash. The light was not supernatural.		'''The conclusion:''' The light on the far wall was simply a reflection of the photographer's flash. The light was not supernatural.