<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>https://en.believethesign.com/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=A_Critique_of_each_Vision</id>
	<title>A Critique of each Vision - Revision history</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://en.believethesign.com/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=A_Critique_of_each_Vision"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://en.believethesign.com/index.php?title=A_Critique_of_each_Vision&amp;action=history"/>
	<updated>2026-04-13T06:11:22Z</updated>
	<subtitle>Revision history for this page on the wiki</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.43.0</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://en.believethesign.com/index.php?title=A_Critique_of_each_Vision&amp;diff=23849&amp;oldid=prev</id>
		<title>Admin: Created page with &quot;{{Top of Page}} {{Template:Seven Visions Analysis}}  ==A Critique of each Vision== As we look at the statements that William Branham made in his sermons there is a common them...&quot;</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://en.believethesign.com/index.php?title=A_Critique_of_each_Vision&amp;diff=23849&amp;oldid=prev"/>
		<updated>2019-05-29T16:53:34Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Created page with &amp;quot;{{Top of Page}} {{Template:Seven Visions Analysis}}  ==A Critique of each Vision== As we look at the statements that William Branham made in his sermons there is a common them...&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;New page&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div&gt;{{Top of Page}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{Template:Seven Visions Analysis}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==A Critique of each Vision==&lt;br /&gt;
As we look at the statements that William Branham made in his sermons there is a common theme:  he frequently added to or changed the original details.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As already argued, it is difficult to imagine that the record of the visions in the Church Age Book is not definitive and therefore equally difficult to imagine that it could be changed.  This then raises questions about these modifications – why were contrary statements made in the sermons?  Why were the originals not referenced?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
All of the sermon statements related to the visions are included here.  Most of them reiterate the basics of each vision however there are a significant number that don’t and a subset of those will be considered here.  The following general comments can be made:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:*Some visions were first mentioned post fact and therefore cannot be considered to constitute be prophecies.&lt;br /&gt;
:*Sermon statements sometimes add detail to the original.&lt;br /&gt;
:*Sermon statements sometimes modify the original.&lt;br /&gt;
:*No vision published before the fact has unequivocally been fulfilled.&lt;br /&gt;
:*The 1977 date for the fulfillment of all of the visions has passed.&lt;br /&gt;
:*The fulfillment of the visions was supposed to herald the soon coming of Christ.&lt;br /&gt;
:*The ‘Three ISMs’ vision cannot now be fulfilled.&lt;br /&gt;
:*The rise to power of the Catholic Church in America is unlikely ever to be fulfilled.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But to reiterate, the basic problem with statements he made in sermons from 1953 on, is that details are changed and this is impossible to justify.  As the years passed, he should have just been restating the visions and relating world events to their progressive fulfillment.  So, each one of the variations listed in this section has to be seen as an implied modification to the original vision.  Visions don’t work that way and why he changed the details of the visions cannot be explained.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This section highlights some of the variations over time and also provides a critique of the vision itself based on actual events and developments.&lt;br /&gt;
{{Bottom of Page}}&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Admin</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>